Some people say that the government should stop TV and newspapers from showing crimes because media coverage of violent crimes is frightening people and encouraging criminals. Do you agree or disagree?
Press and media give too much significance to aggression because of its shock and surprise value. It has been rightly said violence frightens individuals. It disgusts them but at the same time it interests them as well. Media coverage of violence has both optimistic and depressing effects on the society. Let’s discuss how.
Generally speaking, individuals have too much interest in crimes. They take pleasure in reading about crime events. That is the cause media covers such actions. Aggressive stories disgust most people, at the same time, they also encourage criminals. Just because some individuals will be encouraged to carry out crimes after reading about them, the media should not be asked to cease covering such events.
The principal responsibility of media is to notify individuals of all the good and bad things happening in the society. Since violence is on the rise, media needs to report it. They, however, need to certify that they are not promoting or glorifying such crimes.
Media coverage of violence has numerous benefits. On the one hand, violent events frighten people. On the other hand, it encourages them to take the safety measures to stay safe. For example, parents who study about the kidnap and murder of children will take the steps to ensure that their child does not become the next victim. People often commit awful crimes under the influence of drugs and alcohol. Adolescents who read about such crimes will think twice before indulging in such practices themselves. On the down side, tremendous coverage of violence can make people insensible to them. The huge majority of people who watch visuals of gory murders are repelled by what they see. Unluckily, if we keep bearing in mind such visuals, we will discontinue becoming affected by them. This indifference can be unsafe. Still, it can prop up those with illegal tendencies to perform alike crimes.
To conclude, reporting of violence surely has both constructive and negative impacts on the civilization. This, nonetheless, does not indicate that the government should ask media to stop covering such events. Any such shift will amount to limiting the liberty of the press.